I don’t want to do anything that would endanger the troops;

America keeps hearing from Congressperson, almost exclusively Republican, Conservative, I don’t want to do anything that would endanger the troops; well what would endanger the troops? We need to hear that fact base discussion.

01/24/2007

By Bruce H, Scroggins

America and I hear this oft-repeated refrain, mostly heard by the RIGHT, Capping troops levels, will that hurt the troops in the field, yes if there’s no contingency for extraordinary circumstances, but if there is an allowance for the unexpected, Congress can cap troop levels. Whether it’s binding, or non-binding, Congress must act, The ISG is a Plan and the Resolution offered by Sen. Biden and Dodd, with Sen. Chuck Hegel, it’s a step, I would prefer it be BINDING, but none the less, this is a first step… BUSH is already implementing, his surge into Baghdad.

Secretary RICE was ask at the last Senate Hearing; what happens if Maliki doesn’t act? She had “NO ANSWER,” none, nada, zilch, bubcus, and "0." And he could of ask, what was consequence, for all the last times, we surged, I’ll tell you a fat “0.”

There has been some who suggest, Congress can cut off the money for the troops, some say now money, some say future money, but the truth is BUSH already has the funds too do what He is doing, so that’s straw argument, used to try an inflame some in their base. Congress can stop future funding, but “no funding of today troop movements,” can be affected by Congress, for “today’s troop surge,” being moved forward by Bush as we speak and write “today.”

Congress must ACT, to stop Bush…

Iraqi’s are engaged in a Civil War, that started 1,500 years ago, surge–up, surge-down, Bush, Cheney, Rice, And those who think, let’s give the President the deference, once again… America voted and said, “LET’S NOT AND SAY WE DID… AND WE DID.”