CNN, MSNBC, ABC, NBC, CBS, and all News Programs reporting the News, this includes the RNC fox network.

By Bruce H, Scroggins

When reporting any allegations, past or present, like Cunningham, Delay, Murtha, Ney, Jefferson, Haggard, Foley, when there has been a find of “FACTS,” like “Not Guilty,” include in your reporting of the past, or present allegations, charge and defense, not just the charge and when the finding have been adjudicated, after stating the charge, state the findings and “why?” they were found “guilty,” or “Not guilty.”

I watch the new programs and am left with the idea of there was a charge, or they were guilty, or this what the FBI was doing, but I do not know why after the “FACTS”, why they were guilty, or not guilty. On Murtha, they keep repeating the Film clip, of the “Abcam, undercover taping,” I see John Murtha, seated and talking, but then, many, not all say, he was of course “Found, Not Guilty,” WHY was he found not guilty, what was the evidence? Used to arrive at a not guilty verdict? Or guilty verdict? And make it PLAIN to your viewers, it’s like the news shows are playing the allegation and tape of the evidence for the charge, but have no interest in playing the evidence for an “ACQUITTLE,” only keep playing the tape, of the young man’s questionable response to $50,000 grand.

You know not one of you supposed news show could tell me why? O.J. was found not guilty; you know all the evidence for why? You believe he’s guilty, but the jury found him not guilty, now what was the evidence for that verdict? Or the evidence for not guilty?

Whether you believe a person guilty, or innocent, is not the point, at least until, a jury of his peers, hears the evidence, the facts and all the facts, are what I tune in to hear, not your trying to hype the front end, when you know there is just as big of back end to the story. Your networks look to be partisan and unbalancing the facts in the news story and I WANT THE WHOLE STORY, not just your tid-bit.